<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OOXML: Brazil Says NO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html</link>
	<description>Digital Awareness and Flying Spirit</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ABNT Decide Solicitar Cancelamento do OOXML na ISO :: Avi Alkalay</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-130461</link>
		<dc:creator>ABNT Decide Solicitar Cancelamento do OOXML na ISO :: Avi Alkalay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-130461</guid>
		<description>[...] que além de o Brasil ter votado NÃO em todo o processo de normalização do ISO/IEC DIS 29500 (mais conhecido como padronização do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] que além de o Brasil ter votado NÃO em todo o processo de normalização do ISO/IEC DIS 29500 (mais conhecido como padronização do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brazil says NO to OpenXML. So what? &#8226; Roberto Teixeira</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-129862</link>
		<dc:creator>Brazil says NO to OpenXML. So what? &#8226; Roberto Teixeira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-129862</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday August 24th &#8226; IT Business, Technology  The FOSS kommunity is partying in the streets. Brazil has decided NO to OpenXML as an ISO-approved standard. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday August 24th &bull; IT Business, Technology  The FOSS kommunity is partying in the streets. Brazil has decided NO to OpenXML as an ISO-approved standard. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planeta Gifs e Jogos</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-122938</link>
		<dc:creator>Planeta Gifs e Jogos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-122938</guid>
		<description>Olá,
Eu gostei do seu site e gostaria de fazer parceria com vc, posso colocar seu link em meu site e gostaria que vc tbm colocasse o meu link no seu site.


Esse é o meu código do button:

&lt;a href="http://www.planetagifsejogos.hpg.com.br" rel="nofollow"&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;


Abraços!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olá,<br />
Eu gostei do seu site e gostaria de fazer parceria com vc, posso colocar seu link em meu site e gostaria que vc tbm colocasse o meu link no seu site.</p>
<p>Esse é o meu código do button:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.planetagifsejogos.hpg.com.br" rel="nofollow"><br />
</a></p>
<p>Abraços!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OOXML: Venezuela changed vote from YES to NO :: Avi Alkalay</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-120869</link>
		<dc:creator>OOXML: Venezuela changed vote from YES to NO :: Avi Alkalay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-120869</guid>
		<description>[...] This NO was a result of a very difficult meeting. Consensus was not reached and a lot of confusion happened. Exactly as in the first brazilian NO. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This NO was a result of a very difficult meeting. Consensus was not reached and a lot of confusion happened. Exactly as in the first brazilian NO. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog do Cleuby</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-120373</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog do Cleuby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-120373</guid>
		<description>[...] first vote, in august, was also NO, due to the same reasons: OOXML is an awful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first vote, in august, was also NO, due to the same reasons: OOXML is an awful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OOXML: Brazil Says NO. Again. :: Avi Alkalay</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-120296</link>
		<dc:creator>OOXML: Brazil Says NO. Again. :: Avi Alkalay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-120296</guid>
		<description>[...] tech:ok  &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;    It was formalized today without big surprises. Our first vote in august was NO too, because of the same [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tech:ok  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;    It was formalized today without big surprises. Our first vote in august was NO too, because of the same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OOXML: Está rolando um barraco na ISO :: Avi Alkalay</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-117917</link>
		<dc:creator>OOXML: Está rolando um barraco na ISO :: Avi Alkalay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-117917</guid>
		<description>[...] é uma coisa. Sei lá, tal cidadão deve ter razões políticas ou financeiras para querer ver uma especificação com sérios problemas conceituais [OOXML] virar um padrão [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] é uma coisa. Sei lá, tal cidadão deve ter razões políticas ou financeiras para querer ver uma especificação com sérios problemas conceituais [OOXML] virar um padrão [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIO D&#8217;JANEIRO É NOSSOOOO !!!!!!!!!!1111 :: Avi Alkalay</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-114550</link>
		<dc:creator>RIO D&#8217;JANEIRO É NOSSOOOO !!!!!!!!!!1111 :: Avi Alkalay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-114550</guid>
		<description>[...] o Brasil votou NÃO ao OOXML em agosto, anexou também sessenta e tantos comentários justificando o porquê dessa rejeição. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] o Brasil votou NÃO ao OOXML em agosto, anexou também sessenta e tantos comentários justificando o porquê dessa rejeição. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Munich Unix &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Brazil Says NO to OOXML [and India Says NO As Well]</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-95135</link>
		<dc:creator>Munich Unix &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Brazil Says NO to OOXML [and India Says NO As Well]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-95135</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-84512</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-84512</guid>
		<description>I do not see so badly the standard either that they want to implant with because he is so bad? , he is that I do not understand much of this but people speak very badly of which Microsoft tries.I have entered &lt;a href="http://www.ooxml.es" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ooxml.es&lt;/a&gt; and it has seemed to me well…

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not see so badly the standard either that they want to implant with because he is so bad? , he is that I do not understand much of this but people speak very badly of which Microsoft tries.I have entered <a href="http://www.ooxml.es" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.ooxml.es');">http://www.ooxml.es</a> and it has seemed to me well…</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OOXML: ISO Reports from All Countries :: Avi Alkalay</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-76045</link>
		<dc:creator>OOXML: ISO Reports from All Countries :: Avi Alkalay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-76045</guid>
		<description>[...] single comment (J1N8726-02.doc) shows a situation almost lived in Brazil too: &#8220;There is no possible to get the necessary consensus in the mirrow comitte to support either [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] single comment (J1N8726-02.doc) shows a situation almost lived in Brazil too: &#8220;There is no possible to get the necessary consensus in the mirrow comitte to support either [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; The Second &#8220;O&#8221; in OOXML Stands for &#8220;Oligarchy&#8221;, Not &#8220;Open&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-74733</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; The Second &#8220;O&#8221; in OOXML Stands for &#8220;Oligarchy&#8221;, Not &#8220;Open&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-74733</guid>
		<description>[...] OOXML: Brazil Says NO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OOXML: Brazil Says NO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Today is the Day &#8212; The Day the World Will Learn That Crime Pays</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-73490</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Today is the Day &#8212; The Day the World Will Learn That Crime Pays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 03:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-73490</guid>
		<description>[...] Brazil&#8217;s decision to reject OOXML? Policy is one thing, but practice is another. Some sources suggest that Microsoft has just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brazil&#8217;s decision to reject OOXML? Policy is one thing, but practice is another. Some sources suggest that Microsoft has just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China diz &#8220;não, com comentários&#8221; ao formato de documentos eletrônicos que a Microsoft quer transformar em padrão ISO : Portal do Arquivista</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-71130</link>
		<dc:creator>China diz &#8220;não, com comentários&#8221; ao formato de documentos eletrônicos que a Microsoft quer transformar em padrão ISO : Portal do Arquivista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-71130</guid>
		<description>[...] Há quem diga que os países que votaram &#8220;Sim&#8221; não estão lendo as especificações da OOXML, estão fazendo decisões políticas ou simplesmente não possuem um processo maduro de normalização e padronização. Esse parece não ser o caso do Brasil e da China. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Há quem diga que os países que votaram &#8220;Sim&#8221; não estão lendo as especificações da OOXML, estão fazendo decisões políticas ou simplesmente não possuem um processo maduro de normalização e padronização. Esse parece não ser o caso do Brasil e da China. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrique Dante de Almeida</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-71055</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrique Dante de Almeida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-71055</guid>
		<description>Hi,

 It's nice to know that ABNT evaluates innovations based on their technical features and that it works on its own, instead of giving in to lobbying pressures. This is rather rare in this country. Please keep going ! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p> It&#8217;s nice to know that ABNT evaluates innovations based on their technical features and that it works on its own, instead of giving in to lobbying pressures. This is rather rare in this country. Please keep going ! <img src='http://avi.alkalay.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almost, Not Yet - links for 2007-08-26</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70640</link>
		<dc:creator>Almost, Not Yet - links for 2007-08-26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 05:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70640</guid>
		<description>[...] Brazil Says NO to OOXML [and India Says NO As Well] &#8230;the standards process director had to analyze the audio recording of all the meeting, review some facts, review again all 63+2 comments produced by the technical group about the ECMA specification, and conclude that a NO for OOXML is the correct positi (tags: digg Linux/Unix Technology) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brazil Says NO to OOXML [and India Says NO As Well] &#8230;the standards process director had to analyze the audio recording of all the meeting, review some facts, review again all 63+2 comments produced by the technical group about the ECMA specification, and conclude that a NO for OOXML is the correct positi (tags: digg Linux/Unix Technology) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70540</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70540</guid>
		<description>First to Standardize? Who even uses ODF outside of Open Office. Is it not a shame commercial companies like Apple are being political by adopting it. Value my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First to Standardize? Who even uses ODF outside of Open Office. Is it not a shame commercial companies like Apple are being political by adopting it. Value my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: :: Eliax Blog - Para Mentes Curiosas... ::</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70516</link>
		<dc:creator>:: Eliax Blog - Para Mentes Curiosas... ::</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 17:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70516</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;La India y Brazil le dicen NO al formato OOXML de Microsoft...&lt;/strong&gt;

Como muchos saben, después que OpenOffice apoyó el estándar de documentos de archivos de Office totalmente libre y abierto (el Open Document Format, o ODF), Microsoft respondió tratando de hacer que su formato OOXML se convirtiera en otro formato ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>La India y Brazil le dicen NO al formato OOXML de Microsoft&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Como muchos saben, después que OpenOffice apoyó el estándar de documentos de archivos de Office totalmente libre y abierto (el Open Document Format, o ODF), Microsoft respondió tratando de hacer que su formato OOXML se convirtiera en otro formato &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Got Digg ? :: Avi Alkalay</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70461</link>
		<dc:creator>Got Digg ? :: Avi Alkalay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70461</guid>
		<description>[...] OOXML: Brazil Says NO  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OOXML: Brazil Says NO  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70459</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70459</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! Hope this will be considerated from other nations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! Hope this will be considerated from other nations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Il Brasile dice NO allo standard Microsoft&#160;by&#160;Ivan Prignano</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70458</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Il Brasile dice NO allo standard Microsoft&#160;by&#160;Ivan Prignano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70458</guid>
		<description>[...] si pu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] si pu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Universe_JDJ&#8217;s Blog &#187; Brazil Says NO to OOXML [and India Says NO As Well]</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70446</link>
		<dc:creator>Universe_JDJ&#8217;s Blog &#187; Brazil Says NO to OOXML [and India Says NO As Well]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70446</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmatrix</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70392</link>
		<dc:creator>nmatrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 04:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70392</guid>
		<description>The fact of the matter is OOXML is Microsoft's attempt at "future locking" the future of all of humanity's digitals assets in a propietary format.  How unfortunate when 50 years from now quadrillions of bytes of data will essentailly be undecipherable or lost to future generations because Microsoft and friends had their collective heads so far up their collectives asses that they love the smell of their own BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact of the matter is OOXML is Microsoft&#8217;s attempt at &#8220;future locking&#8221; the future of all of humanity&#8217;s digitals assets in a propietary format.  How unfortunate when 50 years from now quadrillions of bytes of data will essentailly be undecipherable or lost to future generations because Microsoft and friends had their collective heads so far up their collectives asses that they love the smell of their own BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70383</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70383</guid>
		<description>Greetings From Singapore

I hope my countries standards board follows the same suit. Congratulations to Brazil for standing up to Microsoft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings From Singapore</p>
<p>I hope my countries standards board follows the same suit. Congratulations to Brazil for standing up to Microsoft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inexistent Man</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70302</link>
		<dc:creator>Inexistent Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70302</guid>
		<description>SPANISH? BRAZILIANS SPEAKS PORTUGUESE!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPANISH? BRAZILIANS SPEAKS PORTUGUESE!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The world wisens up about OOXML &#187; Mc-Kenna.com</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70193</link>
		<dc:creator>The world wisens up about OOXML &#187; Mc-Kenna.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70193</guid>
		<description>[...] heavily on undocumented tricks to work, which puts full control back in their hands. This week both Brazil and India have decided to vote &#8220;no&#8221; at the upcoming ISO meeting where OOXML&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] heavily on undocumented tricks to work, which puts full control back in their hands. This week both Brazil and India have decided to vote &#8220;no&#8221; at the upcoming ISO meeting where OOXML&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brazil says NO to OpenXML. So what? :: robteix.com</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70189</link>
		<dc:creator>Brazil says NO to OpenXML. So what? :: robteix.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70189</guid>
		<description>[...] The FOSS kommunity is partying in the streets. Brazil has decided NO to OpenXML as an ISO-approved standard. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The FOSS kommunity is partying in the streets. Brazil has decided NO to OpenXML as an ISO-approved standard. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prediction on how countries will vote for OOXML &#171; CyberTech Rambler</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70174</link>
		<dc:creator>Prediction on how countries will vote for OOXML &#171; CyberTech Rambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70174</guid>
		<description>[...] the few days we have German voting yes, India (second story) and Brazil voting no. I was expecting German to vote No. After all, they (DIN) were the one proposing a working [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the few days we have German voting yes, India (second story) and Brazil voting no. I was expecting German to vote No. After all, they (DIN) were the one proposing a working [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open documents in Denmark &#171; Lars&#8217; blog</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70164</link>
		<dc:creator>Open documents in Denmark &#171; Lars&#8217; blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70164</guid>
		<description>[...] love this report:  Brazil has apparently had the guts to vote no, and not be lobbied or pressured by microsoft to approve of their defective &#8220;open&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] love this report:  Brazil has apparently had the guts to vote no, and not be lobbied or pressured by microsoft to approve of their defective &#8220;open&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70143</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2007/08/ooxml-brazil-says-no.html#comment-70143</guid>
		<description>Well done.

From ECMA International's own website -

"Ecma is driven by industry to meet the needs of industry" (says it all!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done.</p>
<p>From ECMA International&#8217;s own website -</p>
<p>&#8220;Ecma is driven by industry to meet the needs of industry&#8221; (says it all!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.597 seconds -->
