<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft sells Intra-operability as Interoperability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html</link>
	<description>Digital Awareness and Flying Spirit</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: O que a Microsoft e sites pornô têm em comum? &#171; Linux&#8230; e mais coisas</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120660</link>
		<dc:creator>O que a Microsoft e sites pornô têm em comum? &#171; Linux&#8230; e mais coisas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120660</guid>
		<description>[...] As &#8220;minas terrestres de patentes&#8220;, as várias contradições não explicadas, e a confusão entre inter e intraoperabilidade, o fato de um produto não estar sendo usado apenas de formato referência, mas como fundamento [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As &#8220;minas terrestres de patentes&#8220;, as várias contradições não explicadas, e a confusão entre inter e intraoperabilidade, o fato de um produto não estar sendo usado apenas de formato referência, mas como fundamento [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120280</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120280</guid>
		<description>Muito boa a explicação, você foi direto ao âmago da questão e mostrou de uma forma simples o tipo de comprometimento da MS com os padrões abertos. Parabéns!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muito boa a explicação, você foi direto ao âmago da questão e mostrou de uma forma simples o tipo de comprometimento da MS com os padrões abertos. Parabéns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux... e mais coisas</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120278</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux... e mais coisas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120278</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;"Something wicked this way comes..."...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Something wicked this way comes&#8230;&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fábio Emilio Costa</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120272</link>
		<dc:creator>Fábio Emilio Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120272</guid>
		<description>Very cool slides, Avi. You hit where really is important.

PS: Please, Avi, activate trackback so we could credit your blog correctly. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool slides, Avi. You hit where really is important.</p>
<p>PS: Please, Avi, activate trackback so we could credit your blog correctly. <img src='http://avi.alkalay.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Não confunda Intraoperabilidade com Interoperabilidade</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120165</link>
		<dc:creator>Não confunda Intraoperabilidade com Interoperabilidade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-120165</guid>
		<description>[...] por Avi Alkalay (avixΘbr·ibm·com) - referência [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] por Avi Alkalay (avixΘbr·ibm·com) - referência [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-119733</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-119733</guid>
		<description>Troll, no problem. It is good, desired and welcome to have market leader open the specs on how to interact with its product.

And there is also no problem to transform these specs into ISO standards, unless other similar standards already exist, or the spec doesn't have a standards-grade quality.

OOXML perfectly fits in this description, so for now, whenever Microsoft says OOXML promotes interoperability, read as intra-operability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troll, no problem. It is good, desired and welcome to have market leader open the specs on how to interact with its product.</p>
<p>And there is also no problem to transform these specs into ISO standards, unless other similar standards already exist, or the spec doesn&#8217;t have a standards-grade quality.</p>
<p>OOXML perfectly fits in this description, so for now, whenever Microsoft says OOXML promotes interoperability, read as intra-operability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASF</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-119644</link>
		<dc:creator>ASF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-119644</guid>
		<description>... kind of "embrace and extend" (and extinguish). A new approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; kind of &#8220;embrace and extend&#8221; (and extinguish). A new approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: troll</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-119641</link>
		<dc:creator>troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/interoperability-versus-intraoperability.html#comment-119641</guid>
		<description>You hit the nail. However Intra-operability imho is not in this particular case that bad. MSO2007+'s usability and features are quite superior to the open source alternatives so many people gladly use what they offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail. However Intra-operability imho is not in this particular case that bad. MSO2007+&#8217;s usability and features are quite superior to the open source alternatives so many people gladly use what they offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.687 seconds -->
