<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OOXML: A global NO so far but still counting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/ooxml-global-no-so-far.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/ooxml-global-no-so-far.html</link>
	<description>Digital Awareness and Flying Spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/ooxml-global-no-so-far.html/comment-page-1#comment-120745</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/ooxml-global-no-so-far.html#comment-120745</guid>
		<description>Andy, I&#039;ve been traveling across many countries to talk to their National Standardization Bodies and what I am finding is that these institutions are simply naive and don&#039;t know how to run a standardization process.

Microsoft could cast a YES vote in many countries simply because these NBs don&#039;t know how to act. Sad but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, I&#8217;ve been traveling across many countries to talk to their National Standardization Bodies and what I am finding is that these institutions are simply naive and don&#8217;t know how to run a standardization process.</p>
<p>Microsoft could cast a YES vote in many countries simply because these NBs don&#8217;t know how to act. Sad but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/ooxml-global-no-so-far.html/comment-page-1#comment-120738</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/03/ooxml-global-no-so-far.html#comment-120738</guid>
		<description>They will get it approved but it will be a real problem for both the ISO system and Microsoft. Yes, a bitter victory. I think all sides would be better off when Microsoft gets time to fix the specification, so it would be approved with real consensus and without dirty tricks and stuffing. I would forgive them everything they have done to international standardization. The standard project driven by p-members like Ivory Coast, Jamaica etc. - this is just insane. Don&#039;t they care about the damage they do to the international standard system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will get it approved but it will be a real problem for both the ISO system and Microsoft. Yes, a bitter victory. I think all sides would be better off when Microsoft gets time to fix the specification, so it would be approved with real consensus and without dirty tricks and stuffing. I would forgive them everything they have done to international standardization. The standard project driven by p-members like Ivory Coast, Jamaica etc. &#8211; this is just insane. Don&#8217;t they care about the damage they do to the international standard system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

