<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Test with High Definition Video Conferencing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html</link>
	<description>Digital Awareness and Flying Spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: caio1982</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html/comment-page-1#comment-131275</link>
		<dc:creator>caio1982</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/?p=716#comment-131275</guid>
		<description>Hmm very interesting now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm very interesting now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html/comment-page-1#comment-131260</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/?p=716#comment-131260</guid>
		<description>Caio, we made videoconf tests with multi-vendor that day and it all worked out of the box.

This is the proof that when using open standards as MPEG-4 and SIP, you are not obligated to use a single vendor solution. These equipments can be integrated in an Asterisk.org network too. They are an option of videoconference dedicated hardware if you don&#039;t want to build one for your self.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caio, we made videoconf tests with multi-vendor that day and it all worked out of the box.</p>
<p>This is the proof that when using open standards as MPEG-4 and SIP, you are not obligated to use a single vendor solution. These equipments can be integrated in an Asterisk.org network too. They are an option of videoconference dedicated hardware if you don&#8217;t want to build one for your self.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliano Adolfo Fenolio</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html/comment-page-1#comment-131258</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliano Adolfo Fenolio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/?p=716#comment-131258</guid>
		<description>Hello Caio,
I participated also in the proof of technology mentioned by Avi and I&#039;d like to contribute saying to you that was nothing else supporting the test than both videoconferencing appliances. I mean, there was no SIP Server, or Siemens IP-PBX managing the conferencing. The HD videoconferencing we tested is SIP based fully open standard that can be used under any IP environment. For enterprises, it&#039;s even cheaper than traditional videoconferencing systems and has a much better video quality.

Best regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Caio,<br />
I participated also in the proof of technology mentioned by Avi and I&#8217;d like to contribute saying to you that was nothing else supporting the test than both videoconferencing appliances. I mean, there was no SIP Server, or Siemens IP-PBX managing the conferencing. The HD videoconferencing we tested is SIP based fully open standard that can be used under any IP environment. For enterprises, it&#8217;s even cheaper than traditional videoconferencing systems and has a much better video quality.</p>
<p>Best regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caio1982</title>
		<link>http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html/comment-page-1#comment-131183</link>
		<dc:creator>caio1982</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avi.alkalay.net/?p=716#comment-131183</guid>
		<description>&quot;The first single-vendor videoconferencing solution for everyone&quot; was interesting, though I believe Digium&#039;s Asterisk.org was the first project to bring HD video calls for everyone, for free as in beer and as in liberty. I didn&#039;t look deeply enough at there but the linked address didn&#039;t tell much about the technology behind it. I suppose we would be obligated to use Siemens&#039; abusive priced and IP-enabled PBX for that or at least some special equipment/IP phone, right?

PS: their datasheet had not loaded here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The first single-vendor videoconferencing solution for everyone&#8221; was interesting, though I believe Digium&#8217;s Asterisk.org was the first project to bring HD video calls for everyone, for free as in beer and as in liberty. I didn&#8217;t look deeply enough at there but the linked address didn&#8217;t tell much about the technology behind it. I suppose we would be obligated to use Siemens&#8217; abusive priced and IP-enabled PBX for that or at least some special equipment/IP phone, right?</p>
<p>PS: their datasheet had not loaded here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

