Comments on: A Test with High Definition Video Conferencing http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html Digital Awareness and Flying Spirit Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:11:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: caio1982 http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html/comment-page-1#comment-131275 caio1982 Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:57:11 +0000 http://avi.alkalay.net/?p=716#comment-131275 Hmm very interesting now! Hmm very interesting now!

]]> By: Avi http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html/comment-page-1#comment-131260 Avi Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:38:17 +0000 http://avi.alkalay.net/?p=716#comment-131260 Caio, we made videoconf tests with multi-vendor that day and it all worked out of the box. This is the proof that when using open standards as MPEG-4 and SIP, you are not obligated to use a single vendor solution. These equipments can be integrated in an Asterisk.org network too. They are an option of videoconference dedicated hardware if you don't want to build one for your self. Caio, we made videoconf tests with multi-vendor that day and it all worked out of the box.

This is the proof that when using open standards as MPEG-4 and SIP, you are not obligated to use a single vendor solution. These equipments can be integrated in an Asterisk.org network too. They are an option of videoconference dedicated hardware if you don’t want to build one for your self.

]]> By: Juliano Adolfo Fenolio http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html/comment-page-1#comment-131258 Juliano Adolfo Fenolio Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:28:38 +0000 http://avi.alkalay.net/?p=716#comment-131258 Hello Caio, I participated also in the proof of technology mentioned by Avi and I'd like to contribute saying to you that was nothing else supporting the test than both videoconferencing appliances. I mean, there was no SIP Server, or Siemens IP-PBX managing the conferencing. The HD videoconferencing we tested is SIP based fully open standard that can be used under any IP environment. For enterprises, it's even cheaper than traditional videoconferencing systems and has a much better video quality. Best regards. Hello Caio,
I participated also in the proof of technology mentioned by Avi and I’d like to contribute saying to you that was nothing else supporting the test than both videoconferencing appliances. I mean, there was no SIP Server, or Siemens IP-PBX managing the conferencing. The HD videoconferencing we tested is SIP based fully open standard that can be used under any IP environment. For enterprises, it’s even cheaper than traditional videoconferencing systems and has a much better video quality.

Best regards.

]]> By: caio1982 http://avi.alkalay.net/2008/07/test-with-high-definition-video-conferencing.html/comment-page-1#comment-131183 caio1982 Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:58:43 +0000 http://avi.alkalay.net/?p=716#comment-131183 "The first single-vendor videoconferencing solution for everyone" was interesting, though I believe Digium's Asterisk.org was the first project to bring HD video calls for everyone, for free as in beer and as in liberty. I didn't look deeply enough at there but the linked address didn't tell much about the technology behind it. I suppose we would be obligated to use Siemens' abusive priced and IP-enabled PBX for that or at least some special equipment/IP phone, right? PS: their datasheet had not loaded here “The first single-vendor videoconferencing solution for everyone” was interesting, though I believe Digium’s Asterisk.org was the first project to bring HD video calls for everyone, for free as in beer and as in liberty. I didn’t look deeply enough at there but the linked address didn’t tell much about the technology behind it. I suppose we would be obligated to use Siemens’ abusive priced and IP-enabled PBX for that or at least some special equipment/IP phone, right?

PS: their datasheet had not loaded here

]]>